bobo shooting!
posting at 9:42am in the morning is not exactly something that I'm accustomed to mainly cause more often than not, I'm in a lesson, or a class. but circumstances have forced my hand, so I jump out to defend myself.
NOTE: unlike previous posts, this post will not contain any snide remarks, sacarstic insinuations or humour. It is my equivocal and sincere thought which nolens volens, I feel compelled to type it out.
I guess I'm in a liberal enough position to claim that I feel insulted. You attack below the belt with a personal and direct attack even though I had made nothing of the sort. You lay siege on my upbringing, my opinion, my weaknesses. Fine I accept that. You fire the first salvo, then follow up on your actions by claiming blood yet again by alleging yet another negative accusation. Fine by me, I respect and accept your opinions.
I'm not here to stroke the fire any further, neither am I here to draw myself into a meaningless war of words, nor am I going to attack everything you have stood for. Apropos, I have a strong belief that guys will have to adjourn to girls at some point of time, its inevitable and i suscribe to this belief (whether you believe it or not) and having said that I believe that my tagposts have demonstrated that.
Nevertheless, I am going to defend myself, just like anyone will do under attack.
Nikita did not put anything that explicitly required a rebuttal and I do believe I did mention about her being perennially sensible throughout her posts. You put up a point of who are we to judge women. I rebutt with a similar rhetorical question and quote from a reliable source, fine, i concede some tone of sacarsm was employed but was it really that substantial?
Then you up the tempo and shoot me on my upbringing, my lack of a love life, my opinion of how girls think. I feel that was uncalled for. Allying? I admit that we did talk to Yoke Ming and lay down our viewpoints on certain matters, but did that call for a personal attack? You say I have a big 'balloon' both literally and metaphorically. My question is, who are you to judge? You say that I don't get girls because I'm egoistic. Is that so? for someone who's been fighting aganist generalisation I believe that is one heck of a slap back at your own face isn't it. It has been a proven fact that humans (both man and women) do come up with impressions within 3 seconds and no matter what people may say, people do choose their mates through looks on some intrinsic level. So as much as I can I would defend that viewpoint, although I'll concede once again that it could have been more well placed.
I will however, apologise for the subtle sacarsm when I posted "gw-michael" and that it was uncalled for. But it was posted after your outburst. Compounding matters, you claim that I am childish for attempting to return with a sucker-punch. Perhaps, but what about your choice of posting that post up? That's all I'm going to say. None my my blogposts were directed at anyone in particular, only points of contention.
I'm not going to shoot down the rest of the opinions on the blog, only those which are putting me down. That's all I'm going to say, and as far as possible I'm not going to comment on anything else already.
If you have any one of contention, feel free to approach me. I'm always ready to defend my thoughts and opinions and myself and my family. I'm not laughing, I'm not even wincing at this blow. I'm just... shocked.
NOTE: unlike previous posts, this post will not contain any snide remarks, sacarstic insinuations or humour. It is my equivocal and sincere thought which nolens volens, I feel compelled to type it out.
I guess I'm in a liberal enough position to claim that I feel insulted. You attack below the belt with a personal and direct attack even though I had made nothing of the sort. You lay siege on my upbringing, my opinion, my weaknesses. Fine I accept that. You fire the first salvo, then follow up on your actions by claiming blood yet again by alleging yet another negative accusation. Fine by me, I respect and accept your opinions.
I'm not here to stroke the fire any further, neither am I here to draw myself into a meaningless war of words, nor am I going to attack everything you have stood for. Apropos, I have a strong belief that guys will have to adjourn to girls at some point of time, its inevitable and i suscribe to this belief (whether you believe it or not) and having said that I believe that my tagposts have demonstrated that.
Nevertheless, I am going to defend myself, just like anyone will do under attack.
Nikita did not put anything that explicitly required a rebuttal and I do believe I did mention about her being perennially sensible throughout her posts. You put up a point of who are we to judge women. I rebutt with a similar rhetorical question and quote from a reliable source, fine, i concede some tone of sacarsm was employed but was it really that substantial?
Then you up the tempo and shoot me on my upbringing, my lack of a love life, my opinion of how girls think. I feel that was uncalled for. Allying? I admit that we did talk to Yoke Ming and lay down our viewpoints on certain matters, but did that call for a personal attack? You say I have a big 'balloon' both literally and metaphorically. My question is, who are you to judge? You say that I don't get girls because I'm egoistic. Is that so? for someone who's been fighting aganist generalisation I believe that is one heck of a slap back at your own face isn't it. It has been a proven fact that humans (both man and women) do come up with impressions within 3 seconds and no matter what people may say, people do choose their mates through looks on some intrinsic level. So as much as I can I would defend that viewpoint, although I'll concede once again that it could have been more well placed.
I will however, apologise for the subtle sacarsm when I posted "gw-michael" and that it was uncalled for. But it was posted after your outburst. Compounding matters, you claim that I am childish for attempting to return with a sucker-punch. Perhaps, but what about your choice of posting that post up? That's all I'm going to say. None my my blogposts were directed at anyone in particular, only points of contention.
I'm not going to shoot down the rest of the opinions on the blog, only those which are putting me down. That's all I'm going to say, and as far as possible I'm not going to comment on anything else already.
If you have any one of contention, feel free to approach me. I'm always ready to defend my thoughts and opinions and myself and my family. I'm not laughing, I'm not even wincing at this blow. I'm just... shocked.